it演讲稿模板（6篇范文）

it演讲稿 模板1

阅读小贴士：模板1共计7881个字，预计阅读时长20分钟。朗读需要40分钟，中速朗读53分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要72分钟，有222位用户喜欢。

mario cuomo: "a tale of two cities"

on behalf of theempirestateand the family ofnew york, i thank you for the great privilege of being able to address this convention. please allow me to skip the stories and the poetry and the temptation to deal in nice but vague rhetoric. let me instead use this valuable opportunity to deal immediately with questions that should determine this election and that we all know are vital to the american people.

ten days ago, president reagan admitted that although some people in this country seemed to be doing well nowadays, others were unhappy, even worried, about themselves, their families and their futures. the president said that he didn"t understand that fear. he said, "why, this country is a shining city on a hill." and the president is right. in many ways we are a shining city on a hill.

but the hard truth is that not everyone is sharing in this city"s splendor and glory. a shining city is perhaps all the president sees from the portico of the white house and the veranda of his ranch, where everyone seems to be doing well. but there"s another city; there"s another part to the shining the city; the part where some people can"t pay their mortgages, and most young people can"t afford one, where students can"t afford the education they need, and middle-class parents watch the dreams they hold for their children evaporate.

in this part of the city there are more poor than ever, more families in trouble, more and more people who need help but can"t find it. even worse: there are elderly people who tremble in the basements of the houses there. and there are people who sleep in the city streets, in the gutter, where the glitter doesn"t show. there are ghettos where thousands of young people, without a job or an education, give their lives away to drug dealers every day. there is despair, mr. president, in the faces that you don"t see, in the places that you don"t visit in your shining city.

in fact, mr. president, this is a nation --. mr. president you ought to know that this nation is more a "tale of two cities" than it is just a "shiningcityon a hill."

maybe, maybe, mr. president, if you visited some more places. maybe if you went to appalachia where some people still live in sheds, maybe if you went tolackawannawhere thousands of unemployed steel workers wonder why we subsidized foreign steel. maybe, maybe, mr. president, if you stopped in at a shelter in chicago and spoke to the homeless there; maybe, mr. president, if you asked a woman who had been denied the help she needed to feed her children because you said you needed the money for a ta_ break for a millionaire or for a missile we couldn"t afford to use.

maybe, maybe, mr. president. but i"m afraid not.

because, the truth is, ladies and gentlemen, that this is how we were warned it would be. president reagan told us from very the beginning that he believed in a kind of social darwinism. survival of the fittest. "government can"t do everything," we were told. "so it should settle for taking care of the strong and hope that economic ambition and charity will do the rest. make the rich richer -- and what falls from their table will be enough for the middle class and those who are trying desperately to work their way into the middle class."

you know, the republicans called it trickle-down when hoover tried it. now they call it supply side. but it"s the same shining city for those relative few who are lucky enough to live in its good neighborhoods. but for the people who are e_cluded -- for the people who are locked out -- all they can do is to stare from a distance at that city"s glimmering towers.

it"s an old story. it"s as old as our history. the difference between democrats and republicans has always been measured in courage and confidence. the republicans believe that the wagon train will not make it to the frontier unless some of the old, some of the young, some of the weak are left behind by the side of the trail. the strong, the strong they tell us will inherit the land.

we democrats believe in something else. we democrats believe that we can make it all the way with the whole family intact. and, we have more than once. ever since franklin roosevelt lifted himself from his wheelchair to lift this nation from its knees -- wagon train after wagon train -- to new frontiers of education, housing, peace; the whole family aboard, constantly reaching out to e_tend and enlarge that family; lifting them up into the wagon on the way; blacks and hispanics, and people of every ethnic group, and native americans -- all those struggling to build their families and claim some small share of america.

for nearly 50 years we carried them all to new levels of comfort, and security, and dignity, even affluence. and remember this, some of us in this room today are here only because this nation had that kind of confidence. and it would be wrong to forget that.

so, here we are at this convention to remind ourselves where we come from and to claim the future for ourselves and for our children. today our great democratic party, which has saved this nation from depression, from fascism, from racism, from corruption, is called upon to do it again -- this time to save the nation from confusion and division, from the threat of eventual fiscal disaster, and most of all from the fear of a nuclear holocaust.

that"s not going to be easy. mo udall is e_actly right, it"s not going to be easy. in order to succeed, we must answer our opponent"s polished and appealing rhetoric with a more telling reasonableness and rationality.

we must win this case on the merits. we must get the american public to look past the glitter, beyond the showmanship - to reality, to the hard substance of things. and we will do that not so much with speeches that sound good as with speeches that are good and sound. not so much with speeches that will bring people to their feet as with speeches that bring people to their senses. we must make the american people hear our "tale of two cities." we must convince them that we don"t have to settle for two cities, that we can have one city, indivisible, shining for all of its people.

now we will have no chance to do that if what comes out of this convention is a babel of arguing voices. if that"s what"s heard throughout the campaign - dissident voices from all sides - we will have no chance to tell our message. to succeed we will have to surrender small parts of our individual interests, to build a platform we can all stand on, at once, comfortably - proudly singing out the truth for the nation to hear, in chorus, its logic so clear and commanding that no slick commercial, no amount of geniality, no martial music will be able to muffle the sound of the truth. we democrats must unite.

we democrats must unite so that the entire nation can unite because surely the republicans won"t bring this country together. their policies divide the nation - into the lucky and the left-out, into the royalty and the rabble. the republicans are willing to treat that division as victory. they would cut this nation in half, into those temporarily better off and those worse off than before, and they would call that division recovery.

we should not, we should not be embarrassed or dismayed or chagrined if the process of unifying is difficult, even wrenching at times. remember that, unlike any other party, we embrace men and women of every color, every creed, every orientation, every economic class. in our family are gathered everyone from the abject poor of esse_ county in new york, to the enlightened affluent of the gold coasts at both ends of the nation. and in between is the heart of our constituency. the middle class -- the people not rich enough to be worry-free, but not poor enough to be on welfare. the middle class, those people who work for a living because they have to, not because some psychiatrist told them it was a convenient way to fill the interval between birth and eternity. white collar and blue collar. young professionals. men and women in small business desperate for the capital and contracts that they need to prove their worth.

we speak for the minorities who have not yet entered the mainstream. we speak for ethnics who want to add their culture to the magnificent mosaic that is america. we speak, we speak for women who are indignant that this nation refuses to etch into its governmental commandments the simple rule "thou shalt not sin against equality," a rule so simple -- i was going to say, and i perhaps dare not but i will, it"s a commandment so simple it can be spelled in three letters -- e.r.a.!

we speak for young people demanding an education and a future. we speak for senior citizens who are terrorized by the idea that their only security - their social security - is being threatened. we speak for millions of reasoning people fighting to preserve our environment from greed and from stupidity. and we speak for reasonable people who are fighting to preserve our very e_istence from a macho intransigence that refuses to make intelligent attempts to discuss the possibility of nuclear holocaust with our enemy. they refuse. they refuse, because they believe we can pile missiles so high that they will pierce the clouds and the sight of them will frighten our enemies into submission.

now we"re proud of this diversity as democrats. we"re grateful for it. we don"t have to manufacture it the way the republicans will ne_t month in dallas, by propping up mannequin delegates on the convention floor. but while we"re proud of this diversity as democrats, we pay a price for it. the different people that we represent have different points of view. and sometimes they compete and even debate, and even argue. that"s what our primaries were all about. but now the primaries are over and it is time when we pick our candidates and our platform here to lock arms and move into this campaign together. if you need any more inspiration to put some small part of your own differences aside to create this consensus, all you need to do is to reflect on what the republican policy of divide and cajole has done to this land since 1980.

now the president has asked us to judge him on whether or not he"s fulfilled the promise he made four years ago. i believe that as democrats, we ought to accept that challenge. and, just for a moment let us consider what he has said and what he"s done. inflation is down since 1980. but not because of the supply- side miracle promised to us by the president. inflation was reduced the old-fashioned way, with a recession, the worst since 1932. we could have brought inflation down that way. how did he do it? fifty-five thousand bankruptcies. two years of massive unemployment. two hundred thousand farmers and ranchers forced off the land. more homeless than at any time since the great depression in 1932. more hungry, in this nation of enormous affluence, the united states of america, more hungry. more poor - most of them women - and he paid one more thing, a nearly $200 billion deficit threatening our future.

now we must make the american people understand this deficit because they don"t. the president"s deficit is a direct and dramatic repudiation of his promise to balance our budget by 1983. how large is it? the deficit is the largest in the history of this universe; president carter"s last budget had a deficit of less than one-third of this deficit. it is a deficit that, according to the president"s own fiscal adviser, may grow as high as $300 billion a year for "as far as the eye can see."

and, ladies and gentlemen, it is a debt so large that as much as one-half of our revenue from the income ta_ goes just to pay the interest. it is a mortgage on our children"s future that can be paid only in pain and that could bring this nation to its knees.

now don"t take my word for it - i"m a democrat.

ask the republican investment bankers on wall street what they think the chances of this recovery being permanent are. you see, if they"re not too embarrassed to tell you the truth, they"ll say that they are appalled and frightened by the president"s deficit. ask them what they think of our economy, now that it has been driven by the distorted value of the dollar back to its colonial condition - now we"re e_porting agricultural products and importing manufactured ones. ask those republican investment bankers what they e_pect the rate of interest to be a year from now. and ask them, if they dare tell you the truth you will hear from them, what they predict for the inflation rate a year from now, because of the deficit.

now, how important is this question of the deficit.

think about it practically: what chance would the republican candidate have had in 1980 if he had told the american people that he intended to pay for his so-called economic recovery with bankruptcies, unemployment, more homeless, more hungry and the largest government debt known to humankind? would american voters have signed the loan certificate for him on election day? of course not! that was an election won under false pretenses. it was won with smoke and mirrors and illusions. and that"s the kind of recovery we have now as well.

and what about foreign policy? they said that they would make us and the whole world safer. they say they have. by creating the largest defense budget in history, one that even they now admit is e_cessive. by escalating to a frenzy the nuclear arms race. by incendiary rhetoric. by refusing to discuss peace with our enemies. by the loss of 279 young americans in lebanon in pursuit of a plan and a policy that no one can find or describe.

we give money to latin american governments that murder nuns, and then we lie about it. we have been less than zealous in support of our only real friend, it seems to me, we have in the middle east, the one democracy there, our flesh and blood ally, the state of israel. our foreign policy drifts with no real direction, other than an hysterical commitment to an arms race that leads nowhere - if we"re lucky. and if we"re not, it could lead us into bankruptcy or war.

of course we must have a strong defense!

of course democrats are for a strong defense. of course democrats believe that there are times when we must stand and fight. and we have. thousands of us have paid for freedom with our lives. but always - when this country has been at its best - our purposes were clear. now they"re not. now our allies are as confused as our enemies. now we have no real commitment to our friends or to our ideals - not to human rights, not to the refuseniks, not to sakharov, not to bishop tutu and the others struggling for freedom in south africa.

we have in the last few years spent more than we can afford. we have pounded our chests and made bold speeches. but we lost 279 young americans in lebanon and we live behind sand bags in washington. how can anyone say that we are stronger, safer, or better?

that is the republican record.

that its disastrous quality is not more fully understood by the american people i can only attribute to the president"s amiability and the failure by some to separate the salesman from the product.

and, now it"s up to us. now it"s now up to you and me to make the case to america. and to remind americans that if they are not happy with all the president has done so far, they should consider how much worse it will be if he is left to his radical proclivities for another four years unrestrained. unrestrained.

if july brings back ann gorsuch burford - what can we e_pect of december? where would another four years take us? where would four years more take us? how much larger will the deficit be? how much deeper the cuts in programs for the struggling middle class and the poor to limit that deficit? how high will the interest rates be? how much more acid rain killing our forests and fouling our lakes? and, ladies and gentlemen, the nation must think of this: what kind of supreme court will we have? we must ask ourselves what kind of court and country will be fashioned by the man who believes in having government mandate people"s religion and morality?

the man who believes that trees pollute the environment, the man that believes that the laws against discrimination against people go too far. the man who threatens social security and medicaid and help for the disabled. how high will we pile the missiles? how much deeper will the gulf be between us and our enemies? and, ladies and gentlemen, will four years more make meaner the spirit of the american people?

this election will measure the record of the past four years. but more than that, it will answer the question of what kind of people we want to be.

we democrats still have a dream. we still believe in this nation"s future. and this is our answer to the question, this is our credo:

we believe in only the government we need but we insist on all the government we need. we believe in a government that is characterized by fairness and reasonableness, a reasonableness that goes beyond labels, that doesn"t distort or promise things that we know we can"t do.we believe in a government strong enough to use the words "love" and "compassion" and smart enough to convert our noblest aspirations into practical realities. we believe in encouraging the talented, but we believe that while survival of the fittest may be a good working description of the process of evolution, a government of humans should elevate itself to a higher order.

our government should be able to rise to the level to where it can fill the gaps left by chance or a wisdom we don"t fully understand. we would rather have laws written by the patron of this great city, the man called the "world"s most sincere democrat" - st. francis of assisi - than laws written by darwin.

we believe, we believe as democrats, that a society as blessed as ours, the most affluent democracy in the world"s history, one that can spend trillions on instruments of destruction, ought to be able to help the middle class in its struggle, ought to be able to find work for all who can do it, room at the table, shelter for the homeless, care for the elderly and infirm, and hope for the destitute. and we proclaim as loudly as we can the utter insanity of nuclear proliferation and the need for a nuclear freeze, if only to affirm the simple truth that peace is better than war because life is better than death.

we believe in firm but fair law and order. we believe proudly in the union movement. we believe in privacy for people, openness by government, we believe in civil rights, and we believe in human rights. we believe in a single fundamental idea that describes better than most te_tbooks and any speech that i could write what a proper government should be. the idea of family. mutuality. the sharing of benefits and burdens for the good of all. feeling one another"s pain. sharing one another"s blessings. reasonably, honestly, fairly - without respect to race, or se_, or geography or political affiliation.

we believe we must be the family of america, recognizing that at the heart of the matter we are bound one to another, that the problems of a retired school teacher in duluth are our problems. that the future of the child in buffalo is our future. that the struggle of a disabled man in boston to survive, and live decently, is our struggle. that the hunger of a woman in little rock is our hunger. that the failure anywhere to provide what reasonably we might, to avoid pain, is our failure.

now for 50 years, for 50 years we democrats created a better future for our children, using traditional democratic principles as a fi_ed beacon, giving us direction and purpose, but constantly innovating, adapting to new realities: roosevelt"s alphabet programs; truman"s nato and the gi bill of rights; kennedy"s intelligent ta_ incentives and the alliance for progress; johnson"s civil rights; carter"s human rights and the nearly miraculous camp david peace accord.

democrats did it, democrats did it - and democrats can do it again. we can build a future that deals with our deficit. remember this, that 50 years of progress under our principles never cost us what the last four years of stagnation have. and, we can deal with the deficit intelligently, by shared sacrifice, with all parts of the nation"s family contributing, building partnerships with the private sector, providing a sound defense without depriving ourselves of what we need to feed our children and care for our people.

we can have a future that provides for all the young of the present, by marrying common sense and compassion. we know we can, because we did it for nearly 50 years before 1980.

and we can do it again. if we do not forget. if we do not forget that this entire nation has profited by these progressive principles. that they helped lift up generations to the middle class and higher: gave us a chance to work, to go to college, to raise a family, to own a house, to be secure in our old age and, before that, to reach heights that our own parents would not have dared dream of.

that struggle to live with dignity is the real story of the shining city. and it"s a story, ladies and gentlemen, that i didn"t read in a book, or learn in a classroom. i saw it, and lived it. like many of you. i watched a small man with thick calluses on both hands work 15 and 16 hours a day. i saw him once literally bleed from the bottoms of his feet, a man who came here uneducated, alone, unable to speak the language, who taught me all i needed to know about faith and hard work by the simple eloquence of his e_ample. i learned about our kind of democracy from my father. and, i learned about our obligation to each other from him and from my mother. they asked only for a chance to work and to make the world better for their children and they asked to be protected in those moments when they would not be able to protect themselves. this nation and this nation"s government did that for them.

and that they were able to build a family and live in dignity and see one of their children go from behind their little grocery store in south jamaica on the other side of the tracks where he was born, to occupy the highest seat in the greatest state of the greatest nation in the only world we know, is an ineffably beautiful tribute to the democratic process.

and, ladies and gentlemen, on january 20, 1985, it will happen again. only on a much, much grander scale. we will have a new president of the united states, a democrat born not to the blood of kings but to the blood of pioneers and immigrants. and we will have america"s first woman vice president, the child of immigrants, and she, she, she will open with one magnificent stroke, a whole new frontier for the united states. now, it will happen.

it will happen - if we make it happen; if you and i can make it happen.

and i ask you now - ladies and gentlemen, brothers and sisters - for the good of all of us - for the love of this great nation, for the family of america - for the love of god. please, make this nation remember how futures are built.

thank you and god bless you.

it演讲稿 模板2

阅读小贴士：模板2共计813个字，预计阅读时长3分钟。朗读需要5分钟，中速朗读6分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要8分钟，有146位用户喜欢。

one world , one dream .简简单单的四个词却始终牵动着一个古老的东方文明古国——中国之魂。

2008．奥林匹克精神，即将在这里盛放！

几十年，风云变幻，斗转星移，一个民族，一个国家，一个世界，一个梦想，在这里，不会变。这个梦，像一个种子，它有根，伸展在中华九百六十万平方公里的土地里。这个梦，像一只凤凰，它有绚丽的翅膀，飞翔在华夏十三亿儿女的眸子里。这个梦，像一条蛟龙，它有一种精神，奔腾在湍流不息的江海里。这种精神，一种能鼓舞人奋发进取的精神；这种精神，中国奥运精神，正是顺应时代潮流，应运而生。它是以往精神瑰宝的继承和发扬，是中华民族的宝藏，是对中华五千年文化的提炼。 中国奥运精神更是顽强，拼搏，永不言败的精神。不能忘记，上个世纪80年代，女排精神带给人们的巨大鼓舞，怎能忘记雅典奥运金牌榜上，中国代表团挤身前三甲。五星红旗一次又一次升起，国歌声一遍又一遍奏响。同样不曾忘记的是八年前的蒙特卡罗，两千年奥运会主办城的投票现场的一幕：投票前，由12名与我年龄相近的女孩代表北京演唱了《茉莉花》；那歌声很美，很动人。然而，我永远难忘的确是在北京落选时，她们放声大哭的情景。那一次，北京输了。但，我们从不曾放弃。正如奥林匹克精神所号召的那样“the most important thing is not to win, but to take part; just as the most important thing in our life is not principle, but struggle。

这就奥运精神，也正是我们世世代代炎黄子孙的魂！

2008，让我们共同期盼，让我们追寻，让我们一起为之奋斗！

2008，让我们乘着科技，人文的祥云，点燃心中之火，闪耀一段历史。

2008, 让我们付出，让我们分享，让我们所有的朋友，我们一起，将世界凝成一朵璀璨的花。

2008, one world one dream！朋友们，让我们携起手来吧！伴着这华彩的乐章，共同高歌一曲——《new beijing，great olympics》！

头一次参加演讲比赛，陌生、紧张也伴着激动，感觉有挑战性，我喜欢。

这关于奥运的演讲稿，也许更多的人会用到吧？拿来和大家一起分享~不要版权，哈哈~~不用谢哦！

it演讲稿 模板3

阅读小贴士：模板3共计1833个字，预计阅读时长5分钟。朗读需要10分钟，中速朗读13分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要17分钟，有254位用户喜欢。

it行业投资演讲

it行业演讲稿

随着信息时代的到来与变革，it业得到了迅猛的发展，已逐渐成为占据我国市场三分之一份额的一大支柱性产业。it业之如此发展迅速、日新月异，与不断注入的it业人才有着紧密的关系。it人才已逐渐成为高薪、高科技的象征。当然，任何一种事物的发展都会有 它的规律和法则，it市场也不例外，以下是it职业的现状与前景分析

a、it基层劳动者（如打字、录入、生产线组装等）

其就业特点为工资待遇相对较低（试用期工资一般在400—600元，待遇好的单位月薪可达1500以上），工作比较单调、枯燥，因此 人员流动比较大。但是它属于it行业的基层，对人员素质要求比较低，入行快，比较容易学习和接受。所以此类工作的就业市场一直处 于不饱和状态。据国家劳动部门统计：未来几年内，此类工作者在全国的就业缺口将在40万人左右。《京华时报》02年8月26日报道中提 到：据北京市教委职成处郭中天处长告诉记者，北京中关村仅计算机录入人员的需求量就高达10万人。

b、设计型人才（如网页设计、平面广告设计、建筑和家装设计、动画设计等）

随着电脑应用的.普及深入，各行各业越来越广泛地使用电脑为其企业及产品做形象宣传、包装、设计等工作。在各行各业迅猛发展及对自身企业形象越来越重视的带动下，各类设计型人才（如广告设计、装饰装潢设计、网页设计等）作为it业市场的生力军异军突起，其就业市场范围非常广、缺口比较大（试用期月薪一般在600—1500元之间，优秀者的月薪通常在2500元以上）。据《劳动保障报》报 道：仅就北京地区来讲，其就业缺口就在10万人左右。但随着电脑软件的不断升级，功能的不断完善与强大，此类型人才由原来的单一 型向复合型转变。如平面设计人员除掌握相应的软件知识之外还应在具备一些简单的硬件知识和系统操作知识；网页设计人员除掌握专 业网页设计软件之外，还应掌握图像处理软件和网站维护等方面的知识，如果再能掌握后台技术就成为宝贵人才了。复合型人才在求职及就业过程当中优势十分明显。

c、办公应用型（如文秘、办公文员、行政助理等）

此类人才的工作强度低于a型，在工作过程中能够学到（也需要）很多管理知识，并能增加人际交往和适应社会的能力。其试用期工 资一般在600元左右，试用期过后待遇可在1200元以上。这类工作对人员的要求主要是：熟练掌握应用软件、有较高的综合素质和工作责任心。其特点是岗位流动性强，缺口较大，升职潜力大（升职潜力主要取决于综合素质的高低），许多人由此而走上了管理岗位。

d、网络型人才

当今计算机的普及与发展之所以如此之快，除其具有强大而先进的功能之外，主要还归功于计算机网络的发展。网络使人与人之间 的沟通和交谈变得近在咫尺。网络型人才已成为计算机发展和计算机就业市场上的中流砥柱，其月薪一般保持在2000—3000元以上（如

网站管理、网络管理等）。据北京市社会劳动保障局统计，仅北京市其就业缺口在5万人左右。但该行业对就业人员的综合素质和专业上 有较高的要求。不过，只要通过不断的学习和努力，it网络的就业大门就会为每一个人敞开。

e、开发型人才

作为计算机发展和完善的缔造者，开发型人才在it行业中起着至关重要的作用。如新兴的软件蓝领、软件工程师等，其月薪一直保 持在5000元以上。在未来几年当中，我国对软件蓝领和软件工程师的需求潜力在20万人左右（国家教育部、劳动部、人事部等联合统计）。如果具备一定的文化素质，通过学习和努力，步入此行业无论是从个人经济收益上还是从个人发展上都是其他行业所不能比拟的。

综上所述，从经济发展的需求来看，中国基本上拥有了国际一流的科技创新人才，但仍缺少一支庞大的能够了解现代科技知识并经 过专门训练的技术操作人员队伍，这已经成为制约我国经济发展的瓶颈。我国的it队伍存在严重的结构失衡，既缺乏高级it人才，更缺乏掌握技能的应用型信息技术人才。最近的一项调查显示，我国it业最缺乏的其实是"数字蓝领"和"it白领"，即：能从事基础性工 作的技能型、应用型人才。国家有关部门预计，在未来3至5年内，我国it企业将有40万的此类人才缺口。解决这些问题，依靠传统的学历教育已远远跟不上信息产业对人才的需要。如何搞好计算机应用教育是整个教育界面临的一大课题 。在这个领域内，北师大培训基地做了大量的工作。现在，我们要做的第一件事情就是直接将这种培训定位于"it职业教育"。据统计,发达国家当中，技能证书持有者的就业率明显高于学历证书的持有者，许多大学毕业生一出校门就要先去培训，拿一个技术证书以 证明自己能干什么。所以说，it职业培训无疑是青年人就业发展和获取高薪的一条捷径。

it演讲稿 模板4

阅读小贴士：模板4共计590个字，预计阅读时长2分钟。朗读需要3分钟，中速朗读4分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要6分钟，有254位用户喜欢。

hello everybody,good afternoon.

i know you"re in high school and you will be faced with the choice of university majors. today i want to give you some advice about it.

first of all,you must realize it’s very important for you to choose a subject in the university.

president obama said that you should always understood that when times change,so must we.so a good professional course can improve your thinking and work ability.

in my opinion ,education is the best subject that you should study in the university. in the 21 century, education is the most important basis for a country. （question）as a matter of fact ,there are many many people want to go abroad such as america ,britain,cannada. becauseof their high technology , their good conditions of life , their beautiful cities . the truth is everything is connected with the level of education.because of the good education of the people, they can do many things in the city about the humanities, the rule of law, the economy.the purpose of education is not only reflect the will of a country"s interests,but also can regulate the whole process of education activities so that educational activities to adapt to the law of education and the need of society.as for me,i think education is the no.1 productive forces.

if you choose the education as the major in the university,you will easy to find a job after you graduated.nowadays,the country needs more educator to develop the level of educate and also education can develop your mind of thinking in different ways.it’s really a good choose to study education in the university.maybe you will be changed the future of the country，even the world.

anyway,i think education is the best subject study in university.i hope my speech can help

you.

th_.

it演讲稿 模板5

阅读小贴士：模板5共计1111个字，预计阅读时长3分钟。朗读需要6分钟，中速朗读8分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要11分钟，有283位用户喜欢。

one world , one dream .简简单单的四个词却始终牵动着一个古老的东方文明古国——中国之魂。

2024．奥林匹克精神，即将在这里盛放！

几十年，风云变幻，斗转星移，一个民族，一个国家，一个世界，一个梦想，在这里，不会变。这个梦，像一个种子，它有根，伸展在中华九百六十万平方公里的土地里。这个梦，像一只凤凰，它有绚丽的翅膀，飞翔在华夏十三亿儿女的眸子里。这个梦，像一条蛟龙，它有一种精神，奔腾在湍流不息的江海里。这种精神，一种能鼓舞人奋发进取的精神；这种精神，中国奥运精神，正是顺应时代潮流，应运而生。它是以往精神瑰宝的继承和发扬，是中华民族的宝藏，是对中华五千年文化的提炼。

中国奥运精神内涵丰富，首先它是最深厚，最基本的爱国主义精神。1932年，在爱国将领张学良的资助下，刘长春只身漂泊海上21天，到达洛杉机。在男子一百米预赛中，一路领先，然而疲惫不堪的刘长春，还是被遗憾淘汰，1936年柏林奥运会，进入撑杆跳决赛的中国运动员竟买不起比赛用杆，1948年，伦敦奥运会中国代表团是参赛团中唯一住不起奥运村的。这不堪回首的一页，早已被我们翻过。在1979年，中国恢复了在国际奥委会上的合法席位。1984年7月29日，许海峰的一声枪响实现了中国奥运金牌史上零的突破。正是在这样的历史大背景下，人民的爱国之情，强国之梦与体育精神密不可分的结合在一起。终于2024年奥林匹克盛会选择了北京，选择了中国。这也是对深爱着祖国的华夏儿女最崇高的奖赏。

中国奥运精神更是顽强，拼搏，永不言败的精神。不能忘记，上个世纪80年代，女排精神带给人们的巨大鼓舞，怎能忘记雅典奥运金牌榜上，中国代表团挤身前三甲。五星红旗一次又一次升起，国歌声一遍又一遍奏响。同样不曾忘记的是八年前的蒙特卡罗，两千年奥运会主办城的投票现场的一幕：投票前，由12名与我年龄相近的女孩代表北京演唱了《茉莉花》；那歌声很美，很动人。然而，我永远难忘的确是在北京落选时，她们放声大哭的情景。那一次，北京输了。但，我们从不曾放弃。正如奥林匹克精神所号召的那样"the most important thing is not to win, but to take part; just as the most important thing in our life is not principle, but struggle。

这就奥运精神，也正是我们世世代代炎黄子孙的魂！

2024，让我们共同期盼，让我们追寻，让我们一起为之奋斗！

2024，让我们乘着科技，人文的祥云，点燃心中之火，闪耀一段历史。

2024, 让我们付出，让我们分享，让我们所有的朋友，我们一起，将世界凝成一朵璀璨的花。

2024, one world one dream！朋友们，让我们携起手来吧！伴着这华彩的乐章，共同高歌一曲——《new beijing，great olympics》！

头一次参加演讲比赛，陌生、紧张也伴着激动，感觉有挑战性，我喜欢。

这关于奥运的演讲稿，也许更多的人会用到吧？拿来和大家一起分享~不要版权，哈哈~~不用谢哦！

it演讲稿 模板6

阅读小贴士：模板6共计1060个字，预计阅读时长3分钟。朗读需要6分钟，中速朗读8分钟，在庄重严肃场合朗读需要10分钟，有205位用户喜欢。

敬爱的老师，亲爱的同学们：

大家好！今天我们演讲的题目是《责任伴随我们的人生》。

dear teachers and fellow students. good morning! today the topic of our speech is : responsibilities in our life.

明朝名医李时珍，三十八岁就已享誉盛名。但他却毅然离开王府，辞别太医院，在风雨严寒中跋山涉水，采集草药。终于在晚年写出《本草纲目》。因为他明白——他的责任是悬壶济世！

li shizhen, a doctor in the ming dynasty, had already enjoyed a good reputation at the age of 38. but he resolutely left the palace and resigned from the imperial hospital. then he travelled the lands and lakes to collect herbs and wasn"t afraid of the cold, wind, or storm. he finally wrote the compendium of materia medica in his latter years. he understood that it was his responsibility to cure the sick!

在我们周围，经常看到这样的景象：值日生总会留在班级，把灯、门窗关好才走；班长总是尽职尽责的为班级的大小事情服务；课代表们认真的收发各科作业，不辞辛苦的将一垛垛高高的作业从楼上搬到楼下；班主任细致的管理班级事务，关注着每一个学生。他们的行为表达方式不一样，但都可以用同一个词来描述，那就是：承担责任。

around here, such is a common sight: students always stay in class; the lights, doors and windows are closed before they leave; the class leader always serves the class with due diligence. class representatives diligently send and receive each group"s work；they take pains to move a tall stack of paper up and down the stairs; the homeroom teacher carefully manages class affairs, paying close attention to each student silently. they behave in different ways, but they can all be described with the same words: carrying one"s own responsibility.

想想我们的生活中，无时无刻不充满了责任。不同的角色也有着不同的责任。当你做为一名学生，勤奋学习便是责任；作为子女，孝敬父母便是责任；作为朋友，相互关心，便是责任……同时，我相信，责任它也决不是一个挂在嘴边的空泛的口号而已。在我眼中，责任不应该是一种客观要求的行为，而更应是一种自主的，发自内心的行为和做法。当你把承担责任当做一种兴趣，一种自觉性，自发性行为时，我相信，这时的你已经离成功不远了。

think of back through our lives, it was full of responsibilities. different roles have different responsibilities. when you are a student, it is your duty to study hard. as children, it is one"s duty to honor one"s parents. as friends, mutual concern is one"s responsibility. at the same time, i believe that responsibility is by no means empty words. in my eyes, responsibility should not be an mindfully required, but more so be autonomous, natural behavior, with practice. when you take responsibility as an goal, as an eventual of unconscious, natural behavior, i believe that you are not far from success.

我们的演讲完毕，谢谢大家。

thank you for your time.